Forcing source review makes the difference between a claim and a checked answer visible. Research and document work often blur sourced facts and model interpretation.
Require every important statement to be tied to a file, section, link or explicit assumption.
Start with a narrow boundary: which website, space, file, recipient or decision is affected? This makes the task reviewable instead of turning it into a broad catch-all request.
A useful work order is: “Answer with sourced facts, interpretations, assumptions and open uncertainties separated.” For important cases, add that uncertainties must be marked visibly instead of being filled in silently.
Pay special attention to files, sources, responsibilities and expected output format. These points decide whether the result is only useful for the moment or can be found, checked and continued by the team later.
Do not accept confident wording without a basis for verification.
The answer becomes easier to trust because it is easier to check.