Hallucinations become less dangerous when facts, assumptions and sources are visibly separated. Confident language can hide weak evidence. This is risky in research, contracts, figures and customer communication.
Ask for source references, section names, assumptions and open gaps before using the answer externally.
Start with a narrow boundary: which website, space, file, recipient or decision is affected? This makes the task reviewable instead of turning it into a broad catch-all request.
A useful work order is: “Separate sourced facts, interpretations, assumptions and open questions in this answer.” For important cases, add that uncertainties must be marked visibly instead of being filled in silently.
Pay special attention to current work status, confirmed decisions and open questions. These points decide whether the result is only useful for the moment or can be found, checked and continued by the team later.
Do not accept fluent wording as proof that the underlying claim is correct.
The answer becomes reviewable instead of merely convincing.